HaazeMinis
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2003
- Messages
- 623
- Reaction score
- 0
:saludando:
Last edited by a moderator:
I agree with JMS on this aspectI don't know, I don't very much like the idea even paying more then AMHA!! Not saying AMHA is expensive, I love there World Mag. I think its just funny that they raise the price once when everybody is starting to renew their membership. I wish they had something like AMHA does, once your a member you price goes down on membership. Fortunatly for them I'm willing to pay for it, I just don't like it lol. Sorry not to sound neg. I'm sure they can use every cent, but boy it's going to be hard paying for membership on two registeries now.
I agree with this statement too.Rob, the current membership fee is $45, $56 for Canadians. Nothing to do with the exchange rate, we pay $56 US for our membership. The new fee is $65, $76 for Canadians. I assume the difference is supposed to cover the higher cost of mailing the Journal to Canada.
Personally I'd be happy to just pay a lower fee for membership for registry purposes & never mind the Journal. I'd suggest separating the membership from the Journal....set a membership fee & then anyone wanting the magazine can pay a subscription fee.
What's really a shame is for the new owner to have to pay $65 (or $76) just to get their new Mini transferred into their name. There were plenty who just didn't bother at the old rate. Now I predict there will be even more since the fee has jumped by $20. There ought to be a non-member rate, especially on transfers- $15 for members, $30 for non-members? That's way cheaper than the $15 + $65 that person will have to pay now. People complain about selling horses that never get transferred into the new owners' name....not surprising that it happens!
I think that is correct, with at least one of the registries if not both. I'm sure I remember seeing a price with the magazine, and without.I thought there was a membership you could get at a lower price and exclude the Journal? did i dream that?
They do have a subscription offer for the Journal, but I do not see anywhere in the new work order where it offers you just the membership and not the Journal. I never remeber seeing that in the past either. If they do offer where you can just get the membership and not the Journal I think people won't complain as much. The Journal is good reading material, but I don't see the comparison at all to the AMHA Mag., I'm sorry I don't. The Journal is nice, but I still don't see the reason to pay a whole lot extra for it, if that is the case the money hike is going towards "The Journal".I think that is correct, with at least one of the registries if not both. I'm sure I remember seeing a price with the magazine, and without.I thought there was a membership you could get at a lower price and exclude the Journal? did i dream that?
Just like the prefix/suffix last year wasn't it, no warning? I still find it to be funny that they did this when everyone is just starting to renew their memberships.I was told it was due to office costs not just the system. However that said I DO think it was not right to just get a letter with no warning about this. Darn it, I'm one of the last ones to get the Journal and I was one of the first ones to get the hike increase letter! The Journal is always late and not only that I got at least seven letters stating I must attend a stewards clinic this year! One would have been sufficient! That said I have horses registered in both registries and will continue to support both I just don't like how this was done!
Enter your email address to join: