This following statement in the original post, along with the lack of "bedside manners" is what made me say that the vet should have further action taken against him:
He trembled during and after the procedure. it took him a long time ( 2 hours) to "recover" and get back on his feet. He still trembled 14 hours later. He was gelded at 10:30 am. Didn't get on his feet until 1 pm. this is even with a reversel drug.
I feel like Ashley does about this. If the jack was
trembling as stated above, there was obviously something wrong, and the jack was most likely in a drug induced or surgery induced shock at the minimum. Shock is not something to be taken lightly. Any vet should know this and should have been VERY concerned and should have been following this animal a little more closely.
Further ANY time an animal has that many problems recovering, something went wrong, especially since a reversal drug was also given and it still took 2 hours for the animal to stand. It could be that the animal was overly sensative to the drugs, or it could be a mistake on the part of the vet. Yes, mistakes can happen. But, why did the vet not even care so much that he didn't even return the call after the jack passed with an "I'm so sorry for your loss" statement!
And while some think that it is not unusual for a vet to leave while the animal is still down, I have never had a vet do that with my horses. In all the years that I have owned horses (Since the late 70's), our vets, and there have been several from different facilities, have ALWAYS stayed until the animal was fully standing and not stumbling around and possibly falling into things. Good thing.... I had an Arab gelding that had a hard time of it and faught the anesthesia as he was coming out of it and needed to be partly drugged a second time to keep him from hurting himself as he faught the effects of the drugs. If my vet had left with him laying there until he recovered, we would have had a dead horse as he was trying to flip himself while trying to get to his feet. It was one of the worst gelding proceedures that I have ever wittnessed.
I am more than willing to work with vets, realize they are human, and forgive if something this severe happens, as I know that some things are out of one's control. BUT.... IMO.... any vet that does not care enough to even return my calls deserves to have other options looked into. I have NEVER had a vet not care enough to follow up with me with at least a phone call when my animals have a hard time with proceedures. And in fact, I even had a vet come out and look at an Arab that broke his neck and not charge me for a visit to tell me why the horse died. And EVERY vet that I have used has always sent personal condolenses to me, by a phone call or a sympathy card, when I lost an animal.
Even if the necropsy wasn't done, I would still file a complaint in this case. You see, it is VERY important that the veterinary board knows about this so that the jack becomes a statistic that is linked with this vet. This may not be the only case that has happened, and when others have voice concerns, well... Even if one does not recover anything from this financially, at least the incident is on file and if it turns out that others have issues, then you all can work together to save other animals from suffering the same fate. If this really is a fluke, and the jack was just one of the unlucky ones, then that will be on record.
Again, the biggest reason I would follow this course of action is that the vet didn't even return the call after the jack died so that the vet could offer to do a necropsy, at the owner's cost, so that the owner may find some peace in knowing what happened instead of blaming one's self for it happening, and the vet could have proved that this situation was out of his control at the same time. At the very least, this vet should have offered some verbal support which could have made the owner feel less at fault over the outcome.