Michelle@wescofarms
Well-Known Member
I would agree with Charlotte on this one - the only reason most of this crap goes on is we as members don't bother to go to the meetings and we do not make ourselves heard! Remember we must be there in person as, we're not capable of mail in voting on issues to difficult!!! We allow unfair practices and illegal activities to go on without doing anything.
It isn't easy to commit your time and dollars to attending the meetings but it is crucial to do so. I didn't go to the one in MN this year - sorry way to cold to be there in February (no offense MN members, I'm a California girl and we do turn into popsicles below 32 degrees!), but I am planning on attending the meeting in Florida. I would go to the AMHR meetings, but extracting info on when/where they are seems to be difficult or at least not well publicized.
As for the measuring - it's a joke - at local, regional and the national level. I tell buyers that even as the ones that really study in earnest about measuring and are concerned about heights if they show or not. The measuring needs to be at the withers like any other horses is measured. Writing an acceptable proposal though is the tricky part. To many breeders have invested to much in their 'in size' horses to participate. If it could be written to beginning say three-five years in the future and all horses born by x year are 'grandfathered in' at their current height we should all be able to comply. I know it will never happen, but I can dream!
I mentioned this in another post, but this past summer I was with friends and listened to a trainer say that at least the horse wasn't going to need to have tail hair cut and glued on to make the mane longer - I was dumbfounded! I don't know if this trainer does this or not, but just the fact that someone cheats in this way - what is the point?
Another trainer told me how some trainers will purposely sore a horses back so it will dip and in affect give a shorter measurement to a taller horse. One of mine that I bought last year does that - he measures shorter at every show than I measure at home - I guess my stick is better oiled so he doesn't hear the squeak!
Sorry, but I can't imagine or be that devious to think up ways to cheat like that!
It is overall very frustrating.
** Whomever has the names of the trainers involved with this 28"under/over incident, I would love to hear the details - please PM me.
It isn't easy to commit your time and dollars to attending the meetings but it is crucial to do so. I didn't go to the one in MN this year - sorry way to cold to be there in February (no offense MN members, I'm a California girl and we do turn into popsicles below 32 degrees!), but I am planning on attending the meeting in Florida. I would go to the AMHR meetings, but extracting info on when/where they are seems to be difficult or at least not well publicized.
As for the measuring - it's a joke - at local, regional and the national level. I tell buyers that even as the ones that really study in earnest about measuring and are concerned about heights if they show or not. The measuring needs to be at the withers like any other horses is measured. Writing an acceptable proposal though is the tricky part. To many breeders have invested to much in their 'in size' horses to participate. If it could be written to beginning say three-five years in the future and all horses born by x year are 'grandfathered in' at their current height we should all be able to comply. I know it will never happen, but I can dream!
I mentioned this in another post, but this past summer I was with friends and listened to a trainer say that at least the horse wasn't going to need to have tail hair cut and glued on to make the mane longer - I was dumbfounded! I don't know if this trainer does this or not, but just the fact that someone cheats in this way - what is the point?
Another trainer told me how some trainers will purposely sore a horses back so it will dip and in affect give a shorter measurement to a taller horse. One of mine that I bought last year does that - he measures shorter at every show than I measure at home - I guess my stick is better oiled so he doesn't hear the squeak!
Sorry, but I can't imagine or be that devious to think up ways to cheat like that!
It is overall very frustrating.
** Whomever has the names of the trainers involved with this 28"under/over incident, I would love to hear the details - please PM me.