Big fancy show farms do a lot more damage to the population then the backyard breeder who produces one pet quality foal a year, and that is something that you should think about before you criticize breeders who aren't breeding perfection. I am not defending the breeder who breeds 50 mares to a stallion with stifle problems and an overbite, but that type of breeder is not as common as many posts try to make out. You can choose the way you breed, and what you breed to and what you geld, etc. But I read many posts by people promoting gelding and that if you aren't breeding perfection you are doing wrong by the breed, and then I look at YOUR websites and YOUR stallions that you are using for breeding, and guess what? They have faults too! So you aren't doing any more good to the breed then these "backyard" breeders that you speak of. So before you start preaching about gelding, why don't you geld what you have at your farm, because chances are there are many studs better than what you have, so practice what you preach, and go breed to the outside BETTER stallions.
Oh, and the "Buckeroo" thing, well, surprise surprise, there are OTHER nearly perfect stallions out there, guess what, no horse IS perfect. Show me one with nothing wrong with him....?
Personally, I don't like the proportions on some of the "top" stallions, for sure I don't like them for my one little mare that needs more leg and neck for HER proportions.
I seriously think that big fancy show farms do not do "more" damage, it's just different damage. EVERYONE dilutes the value of our horses when they choose a lesser horse for any reason (be it color, height, budget, bloodline, etc.) other than finding the best quality available.
Most big fancy show farms have proven stallions that bring home titles and produce offspring that do. It is the "big mill" type farms that really don't bother to show and sell lots and lots of horses for lower prices based on other criteria that truly do the most damage, in my humble opinion. By that I mean they are not concerned with correctness or give any deformities much of a glance because it has the other criteria they go for such as color, height, or bank on a certain popular bloodline or "fad name". What they then do is to hoodwink others into believing that this is a valid basis on which to sell and create more miniature horses with the same faults but other "virtues" and then people who don't know any better come along and do the same.
I hope I'm being clear, I am tired, and NO my horses are not "PERFECT" because there is no truly perfect horse that I have yet to see. The closest I have seen in photos is Miss Kentucky for a Miniature Horse and truthfully, every Miniature has a LONG way to go to match the proportions of a full sized horse, and even then, I have yet to see the abolutely most perfect full sized horse of any breed.
Having a goal is a good thing. Failing to move forward towards that goal is a bad thing. Failing to learn when we make mistakes is the worst.
Noone wants to tell anyone what to do with their horse, not in so many words. What we'd love to see is truly informed decisions not based on things which have no bearing on soundness, in lieu of a well-conformed and sound horse.
I don't even OWN a stallion, though I am lucky to have a very well-proportioned, sound, and sweet-tempered stallion that is proven to throw show-quality foals available nearby.
Liz M.