Well, I have to tell you I am totally discombobulated and could use some input. I am in no hurry to do anything right away. But if I change my breeding stock, I am toying with the idea of the Shetland infusion. Here's the problem. In one way, I am with the group that feels that a shetland and a mini could eventually evolve into seperate entiities. In other words, miniatures would totally close their books and breed only to registered minis and eventually achieve a sort of kinda breed
On the other hand, I do like the Shetlands, just not sure I want a purebred. I am not too well schooled with Shetlands as far as how they handle. I hear they can be hot and I have worked around the Hackneys which can be very hot, but I have an Arab and everyone tells me they are too hot and too stupid to be good horses and I KNOW that isn't true most of the time. I love a hotter horse to handle (don't want a riding or driving horse that way though
just too old for that) but, my horses are exposed to a lot of children and I just want something laid back. No flames. I am not saying Shetlands are bad. I said I am sure their are lots of good ones. Anyway. I just wonder where everyone stands on why they agree or disagree with the crosses. I am usually one who feels if I wanted a Shetland I'd buy a Shetland, not a mini who looks like a Shetland (yes I know they are mostly Shetland anyway, but you all know the arguements I'm referring too) Same with Arabs etc. If people want Saddlebreds or Thoroughbreds, why don't they buy them instead of breeding their Arabs to look like them. I guess I just feel guilty as I am thinking of breaking my own standards LOL. But at a show this summer, I heard someone very strongly emphasizing that her horse didn't have a bit of Arenosa or Shetland for several generations back, so it got me to wondering just what is it that makes people feel so strongly about keeping the Shetland breeding out of the "newer" minis.
Also, those who have your horses registered both, do you have a good market?
OK, last question and it is a really dumb one, but here goes. Just how does the double registering work. Let's say I bred my mare to a stallion with both mini and shetland papers. If the mare is AMHR only and not Shetland, then I will only be able to register the foal with the AHMR correct??? Or if I bought a mare that was mini/shet and the stallion was AMHR only then the same thing right?
I tell ya. Knowing horses and handling them is a lot easier than trying to figure out rules, regulations and "political correctness"
I appreciate all thoughts here, but please let's not turn this into a mini vs shetland deal. I just want to know why some feel it is a good thing and some don't so if I decide to make a cross I understand what I am doing. I love the stout broad bodies of some minis, but I love a nice Shetland neck and legs to go with it (of course if I can ask for everything, I'd like an Arab type head on there too please
)


Also, those who have your horses registered both, do you have a good market?
OK, last question and it is a really dumb one, but here goes. Just how does the double registering work. Let's say I bred my mare to a stallion with both mini and shetland papers. If the mare is AMHR only and not Shetland, then I will only be able to register the foal with the AHMR correct??? Or if I bought a mare that was mini/shet and the stallion was AMHR only then the same thing right?
I tell ya. Knowing horses and handling them is a lot easier than trying to figure out rules, regulations and "political correctness"
I appreciate all thoughts here, but please let's not turn this into a mini vs shetland deal. I just want to know why some feel it is a good thing and some don't so if I decide to make a cross I understand what I am doing. I love the stout broad bodies of some minis, but I love a nice Shetland neck and legs to go with it (of course if I can ask for everything, I'd like an Arab type head on there too please
