rabbitsfizz
Well-Known Member
I fully agree that the problem itself should be handled privately.
I stand by what I have said, as reputable breeder of 27 years standing in Miniatures and forty in Arabs I would NEVER sell, as stallion potential, a fully undescended colt and I would NEVER sell as breeding potential an animal with an off bite, UNLESS there were mitigating circumstances- although I cannot at the moment think what would cause me to mitigate!! I have only ever had one filly born with an off bite and it was actually born with it and it never came completely right, consequently she was not sold for, nor used for, breeding. I do not personally care how good the colt is (any colt , not speaking of this one or any one specifically, here) I do not care how good it's bloodlines are. If it has and inheritable fault, and I do consider late descending testicles an inheritable fault, I will not breed from it. Taking this argument to it's logical end we would be saying, Yes, I know he throws off bites, I know he occasionally throws Monorchids (Mon= ONE Crypt = TWO, let's start getting that, at least, right, shall we??) I know he throws some dwarfs and I know a lot of his stock goes over height BUT he has impeccable bloodlines and is National Almighty Supreme Champion of the World- so, it's OK because he's good. Jones down the road has a nice colt who ONCE throws a dwarf and we ALL jump on th wagon shouting he should NEVER be bred again ??? I do not think so. If an animal, any animal , has a fault, it has a fault. It's bloodlines and how good it is are irrelevant.
I stand by what I have said, as reputable breeder of 27 years standing in Miniatures and forty in Arabs I would NEVER sell, as stallion potential, a fully undescended colt and I would NEVER sell as breeding potential an animal with an off bite, UNLESS there were mitigating circumstances- although I cannot at the moment think what would cause me to mitigate!! I have only ever had one filly born with an off bite and it was actually born with it and it never came completely right, consequently she was not sold for, nor used for, breeding. I do not personally care how good the colt is (any colt , not speaking of this one or any one specifically, here) I do not care how good it's bloodlines are. If it has and inheritable fault, and I do consider late descending testicles an inheritable fault, I will not breed from it. Taking this argument to it's logical end we would be saying, Yes, I know he throws off bites, I know he occasionally throws Monorchids (Mon= ONE Crypt = TWO, let's start getting that, at least, right, shall we??) I know he throws some dwarfs and I know a lot of his stock goes over height BUT he has impeccable bloodlines and is National Almighty Supreme Champion of the World- so, it's OK because he's good. Jones down the road has a nice colt who ONCE throws a dwarf and we ALL jump on th wagon shouting he should NEVER be bred again ??? I do not think so. If an animal, any animal , has a fault, it has a fault. It's bloodlines and how good it is are irrelevant.