Carolyn R
Well-Known Member
Spring 2009Carolyn is there an issue number or "March 2009" that we should refer to?
issue #19
Spring 2009Carolyn is there an issue number or "March 2009" that we should refer to?
We appreciate your taking the time to write to us about your concerns regarding the miniature horses story.Donna Weaver, a reader of Out Here magazine, wrote us about her horses, so we decided to feature them in a story, particularly since they had won awards from the American Miniature Horse Registry.
On our visit to the Weaver home, there was no indication of any problem; the horses appeared healthy, well fed and loved. As a miniature horse trainer and seller, however, you certainly have a keener, more discerning eye than most of us.
The intent of the story was to show the fun and enjoyment of having a miniature horse, and we certainly don’t want to do anything to hurt sales of this breed. Indeed, we encourage horse ownership.
To show our good faith, we would like to feature miniature horses owned by other Out Here readers in the May issue of the magazine. Would you like to submit a couple high-resolution photos of your horses? Just send them to [email protected] and put “Mini horse photos requested by Out Here editor” in the subject line so they’ll get to me more quickly.
And, going forward, we will take your concerns to heart, and keep a sharper eye on the livestock that we feature in Out Here.
Thank you again for taking the time to write.
Sincerely,
Carol Davis
Maxi'sMinis and ICspots both need to dial it back a bit. There's probably nothing wrong with these horses that a good photographer couldn't fix. They obviously went to these people and took "candid" shots. Most of us would have been so worried and had everything "spit, spot" but MOST OF US isn't the whole world. If you read the article these people feed those minis 2lb of grain and then hay too. If mine got that they'd be little butter balls. Like someone else said the front horse is not standing square and makes it look really bad. The horses weren't clipped and even if they were you can't judge body scores solely from pictures. I think the photographer didn't know anything about horses for sure.
Rag on the article, on TSC for running an unfavorable article (again depending on your view, as it was generally correct), but don't condem these people about whom you know nothing.
Exactly. With that said, those whom have written and received responses, I encourage you to send light hearted pictures of "what minis can do" Jumps, driving, halter, obstacle, nursing home visits and of course be part of our lives. As long as they are used in a positive, educational manor (I would hate for a photo of my kids with one of our minis to be the poster children for the "unwanted family pet" although it is a serious issue).I am not going to comment on the horses. I think that point has already been made. I do think TSC's response to the email was gracious and provided the opportunity for a follow up. I certainly will not stop shopping there as a result. They have offered us the opportunity for greater exposure.
Whats really sad is those horses are not only on the unhealthy looking side but they are bad representation on the quality of the miniature horse. TSC could have found a better farm to do an article on.
Alisha
and there is probably the problem. Here 4 horses get almost one bale of hay a day.but it does say they feed 4 horses one bale of hay a week.
That (depending on the size of the bale) or they aren't getting the *right* feed.and there is probably the problem. Here 4 horses get almost one bale of hay a day.but it does say they feed 4 horses one bale of hay a week.