It is unfortunate that so much mis-information/personal opinion is being presented as fact.
Charlotte
But where is
anything being presented as fact? Everything on a message board is someone's OPINION. What I find to be unfortunate is the way some constantly assure us that the opinions and concerns of others are ridiculous or not worthy of discussion. And when it comes to this subject, I could not disagree more vehemently....
I see what Liz is talking about in her filly. The "thickness" - that can be hard to describe. The face. The overall look.
Yet so many people, including many on this forum, feel that it is their inalienable right to breed cute little mini babies...just because. Sorry, but the world is NOT crying out for more minis, especially those condemned to a life of pain and discomfort.
Well said,
susanne. And thus we should all discuss, evaluate, examine, and discuss some more...
It's important to keep your mind open and TRY to learn, TRY to see where others are coming from.No, not all tiny ears are dwarf characteristics. I don't think that's the point some are trying to make.
I commend those who are explaining, providing examples, and attempting to share "their eye" to those who are still developing an eye.
I'm not saying my "eye" is perfect. I've got a pretty good one for draft horses and minis, those I am very familiar with. Now that I'm into Modern Shetlands, I have to re-train my eye for their very specific conformation and movement. I enjoy developing my eye. It IS hard. I am very interested to see WHY the ponies I have aren't that great compared to ponies who ARE great. Because I always strive to improve and learn.
Excellent post,
disneyhorse... especially the part I bolded.
Marty - there is bad conformation... tending to the "old style"... and then there are dwarf influences. They may or may not overlap. Either way - bad individuals should not be bred. No need to freak out - but simply to look once, twice, three times.... and think.
Of course, some carriers show no signs whatsoever (this is assuming that it is a recessive gene and both parents are involved) ... but those who present obvious signs are easier to take note of.
I can look back now - and realize that many years ago, far from here, a different herd in a different place... some minis I thought of as "odd" or "cute" were undoubtedly minimally expressed dwarfs. It pains me to remember the wildly coloured one that was sold as a stallion - what did he pass on? I looked him up in the online studbook - and sure enough - he has/had sired a fair amount of foals.
He should have been gelded.
I also remember the little red filly that ran at her mama's side when I started working with minis... her excessively domed forehead and diminutive size made her a favourite of many visitors... but I always thought she looked "squashy". And her club feet were as bad as her dam's... who was of the old Ayers line and had a very early registration number. NOW I can look back and see that the little sorrel colt that was born to another daughter of the same mare was a dwarf - although his legs were "normal" for a newborn... and yet he was "wrong", somehow. Again - he was "thick" or "squashy". Within a week he collapsed... and died.
I also can look back and note that the smokey black silver dapple colt that was born to another mare - and who had scoliosis that made him seem as if he was a fancy sports car that zoomed off the road and got wrapped around a tree a bit - was also a dwarf. Except for his "dent" - he was "normal"... and ended up being a beloved pet..
I would post pictures of some of the above horses - but I can tell by the online studbook who owns them now and thus it would not be my place to post photos of them. The colt who died - I can post his pic - and will try to find it. And the silver dapple sports car - well, he ended up being mine before I found him his forever home... and as soon as I find his pictures - I will share them.
Thank you for the pictures, everyone.