ClickMini
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2003
- Messages
- 3,622
- Reaction score
- 0
I really, really hope that people write/call their directors to ensure this sticks (if that is what you want). Here is a copy of the letter I just wrote to the region 8 directors and the Executive Committee:
I am writing to you all in support of the temporary rule change put in place at the last board meeting with regards to World Show Qualification.
There are many reasons I think this is a good idea. I am sure there are others out there like myself, that look upon this as a golden opportunity to qualify for and attend the World Show. From where I live, attending is no small matter. It is a multi-day trip for the horses, a plane ride for myself, and several thousands of dollars. I must admit that competing in the realm where I have the greatest chance to achieve my objectives is a big draw. I have attended the AMHR Nationals to compete with a first year horse. We placed in the middle of the pack for the most part and improved over the show year. By the time we got to Nationals, we garnered numerous top tens and a Reserve National Championship. Instead of "chasing points," our focus throughout the year was gradual improvement and practice, practice, practice. We could have walked into an arena twice to qualify. But that would not have helped us earn our true goal of top placings in the highest level of competition. So we worked very hard to become the best we could be. I compete all-around. These horses are not "made" in the backyard, nor are they "made" overnight. They are tempered into the top competitors they are under the spotlight of actual competition. I believe that anyone with a goal of winning at the top level realizes and appreciates this fact.
I do not have the time or resources to attend shows from both registries. My stretch goal for many years has been to compete at the World Show. I am in the process of mapping my way to achieve this right now. Due largely to the new qualification standard, I now KNOW I can qualify to achieve it, even if we "blow" some classes early in our season. If I have the stress of knowing that I MUST achieve a high placing in order to qualify, that takes quite a bit out of the enjoyment of developing my horse to reach our peak at the end of the year when it really counts. Showing our horses is supposed to be fun and enjoyable for both the handler and the horse. For some, including myself, the pressure to accomplish the goal via the point system might be enough to cause us to look elsewhere for our enjoyment. What if, after all of our preparation, work, and show entries, we do not qualify to go to the World Show? And because I competed in AMHA to try to reach that goal to the detriment of competing in the local R shows, I do not qualify to go to Nationals either? That would be disappointing, indeed.
I truly believe that MOST people would not consider walking into the ring at two shows to be an appropriate development plan for a top-caliber show animal. While there may be a few folks that live within a day's travel of the World Show that would casually enter, I believe that most people will consider the investment involved in attending such an affair would warrant considerable time in the ring preparing for it. Basically, I do NOT believe this will harm the local shows.
Please support this trial year rule change.
Sincerely,
------------------------------
Amy Lacy
Finch Meadow Farm
Miniature Performance Horses
Monroe, WA
I am writing to you all in support of the temporary rule change put in place at the last board meeting with regards to World Show Qualification.
There are many reasons I think this is a good idea. I am sure there are others out there like myself, that look upon this as a golden opportunity to qualify for and attend the World Show. From where I live, attending is no small matter. It is a multi-day trip for the horses, a plane ride for myself, and several thousands of dollars. I must admit that competing in the realm where I have the greatest chance to achieve my objectives is a big draw. I have attended the AMHR Nationals to compete with a first year horse. We placed in the middle of the pack for the most part and improved over the show year. By the time we got to Nationals, we garnered numerous top tens and a Reserve National Championship. Instead of "chasing points," our focus throughout the year was gradual improvement and practice, practice, practice. We could have walked into an arena twice to qualify. But that would not have helped us earn our true goal of top placings in the highest level of competition. So we worked very hard to become the best we could be. I compete all-around. These horses are not "made" in the backyard, nor are they "made" overnight. They are tempered into the top competitors they are under the spotlight of actual competition. I believe that anyone with a goal of winning at the top level realizes and appreciates this fact.
I do not have the time or resources to attend shows from both registries. My stretch goal for many years has been to compete at the World Show. I am in the process of mapping my way to achieve this right now. Due largely to the new qualification standard, I now KNOW I can qualify to achieve it, even if we "blow" some classes early in our season. If I have the stress of knowing that I MUST achieve a high placing in order to qualify, that takes quite a bit out of the enjoyment of developing my horse to reach our peak at the end of the year when it really counts. Showing our horses is supposed to be fun and enjoyable for both the handler and the horse. For some, including myself, the pressure to accomplish the goal via the point system might be enough to cause us to look elsewhere for our enjoyment. What if, after all of our preparation, work, and show entries, we do not qualify to go to the World Show? And because I competed in AMHA to try to reach that goal to the detriment of competing in the local R shows, I do not qualify to go to Nationals either? That would be disappointing, indeed.
I truly believe that MOST people would not consider walking into the ring at two shows to be an appropriate development plan for a top-caliber show animal. While there may be a few folks that live within a day's travel of the World Show that would casually enter, I believe that most people will consider the investment involved in attending such an affair would warrant considerable time in the ring preparing for it. Basically, I do NOT believe this will harm the local shows.
Please support this trial year rule change.
Sincerely,
------------------------------
Amy Lacy
Finch Meadow Farm
Miniature Performance Horses
Monroe, WA