Bonny
past member - Someone just shoot me!
Ok I am going to try and ask/ explaine this to get the best possible answer.
A couple of years ago I worked with wee foal and tested 8 wee foal 38's. All 8 wee foal 38's were tested with the same urine sample. The goal was to determine the accuracy of the 38's. There were 8 samples from 4 different batches. we took 1 test from each batch and tested with the urine, non diluted as suggested by wee foal directions. 2 out of 4 tests were positive. 2 negative.
The second set of tests from the 4 batches were tested with urine diluted 25% with distilled water, as suggested on directions if the urine was thick. Again 2 of 4 tests were positive 2 negative.
Some tested positive that were diluted some tested negative, so conclusion was diluted or not it didnt matter, and it didnt matter which batch the test came from.
That makes me believe that when using a wee foal 38 its 50% possible to get a false NEGATIVE on a pregnant mare. ( the urine used was from a mare 65 days in foal)
So understanding one can get a false negative 50% of the time on a pregnant mare, My question is this... Has anyone had a false POSITIVE result from a wee foal 38?
If youve had a false positve using wee foal 38 can you please explaine the situation to me?
I have a friend with a small shetland mare that had a positive result twice , once at about 40 days post breeding, once at 60 days post breeding. We are thinking of doing a wee foal 120 to confirm if she is in fact bred or not, with so many questions surrounding the 38's. The mare is now roughly 170 days from last cover date. Mare has not returned into heat.
So again if you have had or know of anyone having a false POSITIVE please share for my own benifit
A couple of years ago I worked with wee foal and tested 8 wee foal 38's. All 8 wee foal 38's were tested with the same urine sample. The goal was to determine the accuracy of the 38's. There were 8 samples from 4 different batches. we took 1 test from each batch and tested with the urine, non diluted as suggested by wee foal directions. 2 out of 4 tests were positive. 2 negative.
The second set of tests from the 4 batches were tested with urine diluted 25% with distilled water, as suggested on directions if the urine was thick. Again 2 of 4 tests were positive 2 negative.
Some tested positive that were diluted some tested negative, so conclusion was diluted or not it didnt matter, and it didnt matter which batch the test came from.
That makes me believe that when using a wee foal 38 its 50% possible to get a false NEGATIVE on a pregnant mare. ( the urine used was from a mare 65 days in foal)
So understanding one can get a false negative 50% of the time on a pregnant mare, My question is this... Has anyone had a false POSITIVE result from a wee foal 38?
If youve had a false positve using wee foal 38 can you please explaine the situation to me?
I have a friend with a small shetland mare that had a positive result twice , once at about 40 days post breeding, once at 60 days post breeding. We are thinking of doing a wee foal 120 to confirm if she is in fact bred or not, with so many questions surrounding the 38's. The mare is now roughly 170 days from last cover date. Mare has not returned into heat.
So again if you have had or know of anyone having a false POSITIVE please share for my own benifit