Wait a minute.... those laws said that any "officer or agent of any incorporated humane society, animal shelter or other appropriate facility may take into custody any animal, upon either private or public property, which clearly shows evidence of cruelty to animals, as defined in K.S.A. 21-4310 and amendments thereto."
All of these animals fall under the animal cruelty description, as noone has been out there on a daily basis to feed and water by his own admittance!
Is CMHR incorporated? I'll bet if it's a 501c3 it is! Is it not considered either an animal 'shelter' or 'appropriate facility'? Does this not allow CMHR to intervene? I do NOT see anything here about allowing a 30 day time frame to get the horses back in shape and taken care of.
"Upon the filing of a sworn complaint by any public health officer, law enforcement officer, licensed veterinarian or officer or agent of any incorporated humane society, animal shelter or other appropriate facility alleging the commission of cruelty to animals, as defined in K.S.A. 21-4310 and amendments thereto, the county or district attorney shall determine the validity of the complaint and shall forthwith file charges for the crime if the complaint appears to be valid."
Can an officer with CMHR file a complaint with the county or district attorney? If CMHR is incorporated, I dont see why not?!! I would suggest again contacting the news stations with follow ups that these animals are left in his care still? And yes, I agree with the law that states HE is responsible for the bills.