LaVern
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2004
- Messages
- 1,299
- Reaction score
- 34
I am writing to all the directors to let them know my feelings about this proposal, because I feel so strongly about it. I know that I have to clean it up a bit but this is what I am going to say.
I wish I could come to convention, but there is no way I can leave again. But I am so worried about this measure to let geldings hardship into AMHR. Oh I hope everyone thinks this through.
My reasons for being against it.
If this should pass, why would a breeder ever register a gelding or any of the colts or even spend the money to geld them?
If it would pass it is saying to the guy that follows the rules and does everything by the AMHR book, that he is a fool.
It is saying that the guy who has never been a member of AMHR and never registered anything or sent in a stud report is the smart one for pumping out little non registered horses and the rest of us that have done everything that has been required is - stupid. And there are lot of grade breeders out there.
We should be saying that to own an AMHR registered gelding means something and encourage the registering and gelding of these little guys, and not be saying to breeders that they are not worth anything. Or, that the breeding and the breeders name is not worth anything.
People want these gelding to show and they can't without AMHR papers. That is the one thing that can keep the market value of these little guys up. We as breeders deserve the backing of our Registry.
Please consider this. Thanks Renee Reiten, Lucky Hart Ranch.I have been thinking hard on this deal. And her is another thing I thought of last night.
Example - Say, I pull hair on all these boys. And on the mothers and fathers most of who I have done already. Now someone hardships one of these little boys and I see it out there and I say, " Wait a minute that is not Little Hoppers Champion that is Lucky Harts Gold Fellow and I can prove it". Is that guy guilty of falsifying papers, you bet he is, and the office helped him do it.
I wish I could come to convention, but there is no way I can leave again. But I am so worried about this measure to let geldings hardship into AMHR. Oh I hope everyone thinks this through.
My reasons for being against it.
If this should pass, why would a breeder ever register a gelding or any of the colts or even spend the money to geld them?
If it would pass it is saying to the guy that follows the rules and does everything by the AMHR book, that he is a fool.
It is saying that the guy who has never been a member of AMHR and never registered anything or sent in a stud report is the smart one for pumping out little non registered horses and the rest of us that have done everything that has been required is - stupid. And there are lot of grade breeders out there.
We should be saying that to own an AMHR registered gelding means something and encourage the registering and gelding of these little guys, and not be saying to breeders that they are not worth anything. Or, that the breeding and the breeders name is not worth anything.
People want these gelding to show and they can't without AMHR papers. That is the one thing that can keep the market value of these little guys up. We as breeders deserve the backing of our Registry.
Please consider this. Thanks Renee Reiten, Lucky Hart Ranch.I have been thinking hard on this deal. And her is another thing I thought of last night.
Example - Say, I pull hair on all these boys. And on the mothers and fathers most of who I have done already. Now someone hardships one of these little boys and I see it out there and I say, " Wait a minute that is not Little Hoppers Champion that is Lucky Harts Gold Fellow and I can prove it". Is that guy guilty of falsifying papers, you bet he is, and the office helped him do it.
Last edited by a moderator: