The hair can be a little misleading but the answer to that is don't look at the hair!!
Look at the way his legs are straight and strong in his foal picture, look at the way that that picture shows a well fed, well conformed animal with a good neck and a normal weanling head.
Now look
again at the "today" pictures.
His legs are weak and he is atrociously cow hocked.
His neck is sagging.
His head looks strange (hair grows and sticks out strangely on an emaciated animal, it has that "staring" quality that makes certain areas look deformed)
His fetlocks and pasterns are weak.
This is, quite obviously, a horse that is nothing short of emaciated.
Now I am going to say something a little radical (
) and it is going to annoy, possibly upset some people......
If you do not know enough about horses to not be able to judge the condition they are in you should not own them.
It is as simple, to me, as that.
No-one, absolutely NO-ONE has a God given right to own animals.
It is a privilege.
I just hope this person now realises this .
I just cannot, for the life of me, understand how they could have allowed this to happen.Even if they did not understand that the horse was fluffy, they quite obviously have not been feeding it at all, and for some time.....even if they could not see through the fluff, surely to God they understood that horses need to be fed?????