Minimor
Well-Known Member
I don't see where anyone said it was taboo to mention how things used to be, I even think that most of us know how things used to be....just that it gets tiresome to have that continue to be an excuse when colors come up wrong now!It is a shame that when the "old way of doing things" is brought up it is taboo to mention it.
All breeds were probably that same way, at least to some extent, at one time. Morgans were--there were plenty of breeders who ran herds of mares with a couple stallions and said they could look at the foals and say which stallion sired which--but those breeds have changed their rules to eliminate that sort of thing, and I'd say it's time that ASPC/AMHR did the same. And yes, DNA is useless without PQ at the same time--it's unthinkable to me that one would be done without the other--in Morgans they're all one thing and yes, if an older horse is DNA'd and doesn't match the parentage on papers, that horse loses its papers--which is as it should be.
Regardless of how things used to be, fact is that -- for example--two chestnuts cannot produce a black. If two chestnuts do produce a black then there ought to be some DNA testing going on to prove that the two parents really are the parents, and that the parents are who they are supposed to be....and that one of those parents is actually a silver bay. None of that is impossible.