Pintaloosa or not?

Miniature Horse Talk Forums

Help Support Miniature Horse Talk Forums:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Viki

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2002
Messages
503
Reaction score
0
Below is my filly. She is out of a Sabino mare and Appy stud. When born, she showed both patterns. She is showing more Appy now, with chrome. But, she IS of both bloods. And, she does have both blue eyes that are not from the Appy side.

So, is she or isn't she a Pintaloosa?

1 day old...

MVC-008FA.jpg


2 months old...

MVC-014F-1.jpg


Viki
 
I would say yes, She is a pintaloosa. Maybe a Overaloosa or Sabinaloosa.
default_smile.png
 
I would say yes. I have a pintaloosa filly who was born looking like a pinto with a bit of mottleing.. she now as a 2 yr old has tons of mottling and tons of spots along with her pinto markings
 
Vicki

From her baby pics I would say yes shes a pintaloosa but with the longer baby coat is is very hard to see. If you try clipping her and taking another pic maybe someone more knowledgable than I could help you.

By the way did you see the new Helen pics on the picture gallery? May be on page 2 now.

Nita
 
I would agree that she is a pintaloosa. However, I think she is not just appy + sabino. She has to have frame or splash to give her those blue eyes.
 
I agree she is definately a pintaloosa. Now as far as what type of pattern I must say I get really lost in that world :eek:
default_wacko.png
: LOL I'll have to wait and see what the experts have to say :lol: . ~Jessica

[SIZE=10pt]P.S. She is really gorgeous!
default_wub.png
: [/SIZE]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yeah, I do think so as well. I am not very educated on appy and pinto but to me, no doubt of the appy and that blaze face and socks say pinto.
 
just send her over to me so i can have a closer look :new_shocked:

shes a cracker!!!!
default_wub.png
:
 
I'll be anxious to hear what the opinions are on this question. I've seen a lot of apps with white markings....legs, face. Very striking. But never thought about them beind a pintaloosa.

Whatever, she is CUTE! Look at that little face!
default_wub.png
: I think I need to come over and give her a hug
default_yes.gif
:

Charlotte
 
so are you saying that any horse with a blue eye has to have splash or overo?

not to hijack the thread but I have a pintaloosa who has one blue eye (as her dam has 2 blue eyes) every foal she has ever had has had at least one blue eye but she is a few spot .

The sire however was a tobiano I think ( I am kinda not up on my patterns)

here are pics if it helps she is rough clipped actually I think I answered my own question isnt sabino a form of splash or overo ? If so then yes the sire has the sabino gene you can kinda see her spots in this one

hope07.jpg


here is another one of her backside showing the appy pattern

hopeblanket.jpg


Again I am sorry for asking on your thread but figured since everyone is here answering pintaloosa questions
default_wink.png
:
 
I just *assumed* that the term pintaloosa was reserved for horses that had tobiano plus appy. According to all the replys, I guess any other pattern plus appy qualifies for pintaloosa? Learn something new everyday!
default_smile.png


That sure is a cute filly!!!!
default_wub.png
:
default_wub.png
:
default_wub.png
:
 
Thanks for the compliments on my little gal! I'd always thought, no matter what the pattern, any Pinto + any Appy COULD result in a Pintaloosa. (As long as characteristics of both are there.)

Thanks everyone!

Shane, I'd be happy to send her to you! Is the check in the mail? :bgrin

Viki
 
Viki,

First, I sent MY check for her a long time ago and according to my online banking, it's been cleared for a while so I hope to see some little hooves in my doorway soon!!! :bgrin ok ok...I tried LOL!

She is maturing so beautifully! Look at that short, refined head and those tippy ears!

In my books, if you breed an appaloosa to a pinto technically the resulting foal no matter what color is a pintoloosa. However there is much argument about that since most people term by VISUALS instead of by GENETICS. =) I too owned a pintoloosa filly, she was out of a sabino mare as well and by her yearling shave she visually looked like a full leopard! But, she is a pintoloosa.

To me you have a pintoloosa, and a gorgeous one at that!
 
AMHA told us.

To be a Pinto has to have white at least about the size of 2inches by 2 inches. does not count on face or legs.

Mottling around the mouth and under the tail or spots. Than they are appy mix with Pinto, which makes them a Pintaloosa.

I would say she is an appy....
default_yes.gif
:
 
She is a Pintaloosa, minimal markings.

She has Splash, if you are sure the dam is Sabino then she may also have Sabino.

Yes, blue eyes have to come form Splash or Frame- so it would be worth testing her- does she have white socks and can we see her dam- and sire if you have the pics.
 
so are you saying that any horse with a blue eye has to have splash or overo?

not to hijack the thread but I have a pintaloosa who has one blue eye (as her dam has 2 blue eyes) every foal she has ever had has had at least one blue eye but she is a few spot .

The sire however was a tobiano I think ( I am kinda not up on my patterns)

here are pics if it helps she is rough clipped actually I think I answered my own question isnt sabino a form of splash or overo ? If so then yes the sire has the sabino gene you can kinda see her spots in this one

hope07.jpg


here is another one of her backside showing the appy pattern

hopeblanket.jpg


Again I am sorry for asking on your thread but figured since everyone is here answering pintaloosa questions
default_wink.png
:

She has splash, you can see it in the hind leg white, the way it ends at the top is typical splash.

Yes, it takes splash or frame for blue eyes. But the white isn't always there, you can have a solid horse with blue eyes, it still has the splash or frame gene.

The first horse yes is a pintaloosa. If the only white are the blaze and legs (hard for me to tell) then some people would only consider the horse an appaloosa with chrome, but it's still technically a pintaloosa.

Jessi
 
Thanks Jessi I really had no idea I dont get the differences in pinto patterns I have to really learn more about it
 
Pinto is a pretty generic term- there are many different patterns that fall into that group. Yes I would say the first foal is pintoloosa without a doubt. If it has a 'pinto' parent (regardless of pattern type) and an appy parent, it is pintoloosa. She seems to exhibit signs from both. One parent is a gray?
 
If it has a 'pinto' parent (regardless of pattern type) and an appy parent, it is pintoloosa.
I would respectfully disagree with this statement alone. Two Pinto parents do not always produce a Pinto foal and two App parents do not always produce an App. Therefore, one App parent and one Pinto parent do not automatically produce a Pintaloosa unless the characteristics are there.

I do however agree that the foal in question is a Pintaloosa.
 
:
"not to hijack the thread but I have a pintaloosa who has one blue eye (as her dam has 2 blue eyes) every foal she has ever had has had at least one blue eye but she is a few spot .

The sire however was a tobiano I think ( I am kinda not up on my patterns)"

In regards to Lisa's mare:

Here are a few things I know: 1.) A horse cannot be a true few spot or a true snowcap unless BOTH parents are are appaloosa or are capable of throwing those app genes into the genetic soup. Those named patterns could result from pintaloosa x appy, by the pintaloosa throwing only her/his appy genes. I discussed this with Sheila Archer on the Appaloosa Project. I had a pintaloosa mare x a leopard stud produce a true few snowcap colt. But it can't be a "true" unless BOTH parents are app bred.

So, Lisa, your mare, if I'm reading you right, looks like a few spot, but can't be, unless she has two appy parents. There are false snow cap & false few spot horses. Parental genetics are the key. Please tell me what color patterns the mare has produced? I'm interested! If she is a true few spot, she could produce ONLY app, nothing else, regardless of what she's bred to. This is the current "suspision" by geneticists, but not yet proven. This pintaloosa mare we had ALWAYS threw an appaloosa - snowcap or blanket - when bred to a leopard.

2.) There are two ways to tell the genetic make up of a horse, testing or produce. However, the appy gene has yet to be isolated, so there is no test for it, as yet. Therefore, the only "proof" of what a horse is, is in it's offspring. And a LOT of offspring, not just 2 or 3 babies. So, it's easier to sort of determine if a stallion is "homozygous" for app (still no scientific test) because he can produce many foals. A mare, not so much because she can only make one a year. The barn-test by the way, has to be done with a mate that is NOT APP, so that the breeder can tell what the test horse is. And they are counting apps at maturity not at birth.

Sorry, I am of a different school when it comes to face/leg white and blue eyes. I personally believe the are entirely separate genes, but that's JMHO.

In regard to Viki's foal: I'd guess app. She sure looks app, but it could be determined by pinto testing or in what she produces herself.

As someone said, pinto doesn't always throw pinto (unless homozygous) and app doesn't always throw app. I think the newborn pix shows a "haze" of coloring that sometimes apps have in the beginning. I've had leopards born that were more "colored over" than that little girl, and within weeks, they are bright leopards. - karen

.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Latest posts

Back
Top