Sherry, in answer to your question of how I discern their presence- both!! If I cannot see them I feel for them. I check them at least once a week and have never had a colt withdraw, except at weaning. This year my teeniest, tiniest colt who I had to bottle feed fit three days till Mamas milk came through, was born with a good sized pair, obvious and evident, at birth. I fully expected him to withdraw at weaning, as I had to do this early, and this was going to be a pain as he was supposed to be gelded, but he never made the weight for sedation!! At weaning I checked him again and he was still "intact". I checked him
again just before he left for his new home, to make sure he could still be gelded and, Yes, there they were. I consider it undesirable merely because the end result, ie Cryptorchidism, which I consider late dropping to be linked to, is
very undesirable. As I said earlier, would it be OK to use at stud a Stallion that just has a little bit of luxation?? I do not think so, does anyone else?? So why would you use a stallion that is not dropped at an acceptable age?? All other horse breeds drop by two and are ready to use. In the days when horses were not just pets a colt would be proven by two. He would also breed more than one or two mares in a season- we could have as many as fifty mares with the Arabs, and the fertility was still good (NO I would NOT put a two year old on fifty mares!!) At the moment we have this "myth" that Minis are late dropping. I do not have that problem, all mine drop and mostly stay dropped. I do not know of anyone in this country that has the problem, and no-one has ever said that Minis are late dropping, to me, over here. Therefore I really do think that, like dwarfism, it is something that has crept into to the American lines. I think that, like dwarfism, you would be well advised to do your utmost to eradicate it before we start getting full blow Cryptorchids cropping up all over the place. What do we do then- say that is normal for the breed??