Results of AMHA Meeting

Miniature Horse Talk Forums

Help Support Miniature Horse Talk Forums:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
WOW has this gotten petty.
No kidding. Not to mention personal...
sigh.gif


C.A.R.E. members were asked to give our names in this thread, we did and did not consider it an attack, as you do
I did not point fingers at - or make demands - of you. I did not suggest that you were somehow "suspect" or "hiding" anything. I did ask who was posting under the SN... if it was one person or all of you as was stated earlier. That must be hard when you are hundreds of miles apart. So if all of you are pointing fingers at me and using those words - I think I deserve to know that.

You even feel you are attacked when asked if you own AMHA horses and if are you a member of AMHA. You said, "At the moment I do not personally own a mini. No need to-I work for up to 30 of them at a time 24/7."
Ummm - what was wrong with what I said there ^^^ ? Seriously?
default_new_shocked.gif


This is getting beyond bizarre.

I made a little joke about working for the horses - because I do - and that is held to task??!!
default_new_shocked.gif
default_new_shocked.gif


As an example of what? I mean - seriously?!!

huhsmileyf3.gif


You demanded to know if I was a member. You demanded to know who I was. You suggested I had something to hide. I am not the one who was on the attack/offensive (or whatever you want to call it).

You must be either a youth or an associate member without voting rights, because sorry, the bylaws Article V, Section 2, (A) and (B), states Regular and Lifetime Members are those persons who own an undivided or community property interest in and have registered with the Association one or more American Miniature Horses, who have been applied for and been accepted to membership in the Association, etc.
Sorry, you say? So it seems you are saying that as I am not an owner that my opinions or concerns do not matter...

You asked if I was a member. I said I was. But that is not good enough. I am not the "right" kind of member for you so you will dismiss anything I have concerns about? Not all AMHA members own horses.... so I guess they do not count as well.

We are now through with responding to you on this matter, thanks for reading
Thank you for that^^^ condescending, haughty, completely dismissive comment. That all of you supposedly agreed on. And from all the PMs I have suddenly been receiving - it seems that many others
hug2.gif
have some concerns that CARE obviously does not care about... but only the really dumb ones speak up. Like me.

default_no.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Tagalong- I agree with what you have said, and think that you have done a good job of articulating your points.

C.A.R.E.- I do agree with some of the things you stand for, but like Tagalong, think that you could sometimes tone it down a bit. You claim that you are only trying to state the facts and get to the point and enforce the rules. And I think that sometimes you might read what you have written and weed out anything that is not just that. Personally I AM interested in the facts. Give me the quotes from the minutes, give me the article name. Give me dates, names etc. But don't tell me what I should be upset about, don't tell me what is right or wrong. If given JUST the facts, we are adults, we can figure out the rest on our own.

I know that you have passed around petitions and such, and encourage other's to vote with you . . . . are you also inviting others to actually join your small group? or is that more of an exclusive membership? If you do not invite others to join, why not? If you do encourage others to join, given the support that you seem to have, I am surprised that your membership list is not larger . . .
 
Tagalong- I agree with what you have said, and think that you have done a good job of articulating your points.

C.A.R.E.- I do agree with some of the things you stand for, but like Tagalong, think that you could sometimes tone it down a bit. You claim that you are only trying to state the facts and get to the point and enforce the rules. And I think that sometimes you might read what you have written and weed out anything that is not just that. Personally I AM interested in the facts. Give me the quotes from the minutes, give me the article name. Give me dates, names etc. But don't tell me what I should be upset about, don't tell me what is right or wrong. If given JUST the facts, we are adults, we can figure out the rest on our own.
default_aktion033.gif
default_aktion033.gif
default_aktion033.gif
 

Latest posts

Back
Top