rabbitsfizz
Well-Known Member
I am afraid Nathan is 100% right, in law (Wow Nathan that has to be a first, I really do agree with you!!)
Morally the seller has an obligation and, were this a car, the seller would also have a legal obligation...now that is here, I'm not sure about US, but then only if the seller is a Trader, if they are a private person, all bets are off.
The seller is selling something, basically they don't have to say anything at all, and if they do, 9 times o/o 10 it is your word against theirs.
This has been going on for thousands of years, otherwise Caveat Emptor would not be in Latin
If there is no pre-purchase exam there is no responsibility.
A Judge would not be aware of the finer points of the problems anyway, so it would get nowhere in court.
The buyer needs to talk to the seller and find out where they stand....for all we know the seller may say "Bring it back I'll refund your money"
We should not condemn them until we know what is going on!!
Morally the seller has an obligation and, were this a car, the seller would also have a legal obligation...now that is here, I'm not sure about US, but then only if the seller is a Trader, if they are a private person, all bets are off.
The seller is selling something, basically they don't have to say anything at all, and if they do, 9 times o/o 10 it is your word against theirs.
This has been going on for thousands of years, otherwise Caveat Emptor would not be in Latin

If there is no pre-purchase exam there is no responsibility.
A Judge would not be aware of the finer points of the problems anyway, so it would get nowhere in court.
The buyer needs to talk to the seller and find out where they stand....for all we know the seller may say "Bring it back I'll refund your money"
We should not condemn them until we know what is going on!!